Mudd Law Offices

Providing Legal Representation to Individuals and Business Organizations

 

SI03, Inc. v. Does, et al.
1:07-cv-03266 (N.D. Illinois) and 07-6311 (D. Idaho)

 

Mudd Law Offices filed a Complaint on behalf of SI03, Inc. alleging that anonymous and pseudononymous individuals posted defamatory statements on message board forums found on, at a minimum, the website www.bodybuilding.com.

SI03 Complaint

As a routine matter, the Court dismissed the "Doe" complaint without prejudice and allowed SI03 to pursue expedited discovery.

Order Dismissing Case and Allowing Discovery

Pursuant to the Court's order allowing discovery, SI03 served a subpoena upon Bodybuilding.com, LLC, the owner of www.bodybuilding.com. In response, Bodybuilding.com, LLC objected and complained that the litigation had been dismissed. To remove any substance to this otherwise baseless objection, SI03 moved for clarification from the Court on its order dismissing the case without prejudice.

Motion for Clarification

The Court granted SI03's motion for clarification and explained that the dismissal did not bar discovery.

Order Granting Motion for Clarification

Transcript of Hearing on Motion for Clarification

Despite the Court's Order granting SI03's motion for clarification, Bodybuilding.com, LLC maintained its objections to the subpoena.

 

Idaho Action

Subpoena served upon Bodybuilding.com, LLC

After Bodybuilding.com, LLC responded to the subpoena with formal objections, SI03 was compelled to file a miscellaneous action in Idaho seeking to compel the production of documents responsive to the subpoena from Bodybuilding.com, LLC.

Application to File Overlength Memorandum (Document # 001)

Order Granting Overlength Memorandum (Document # 004)

Motion to Compel (Document # 006)

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel (Document # 006-2)

Exhibit A in Support of Motion to Compel (Document # 006-3)

Exhibit B in Support of Motion to Compel (Document # 006-4)

Exhibit C in Support of Motion to Compel (Document # 006-5)

Exhibit D in Support of Motion to Compel (Document # 006-6)

Exhibit E in Support of Motion to Compel

Part I (Document # 006-7)

Part II (Document # 006-8)

Part III (Document # 006-9)

Part IV (Document # 006-10)

 

Response to Motion to Compel (Document # 011)

Declaration of L. Gary Davis (Document # 011-2)

Declaration of Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. (Document # 011-3)

 

Opinion and Order Denying Without Prejudice SI03, Inc.'s Motion to Compel

 

DISCLAIMER  |  PRIVACY POLICY

3114 W. Irving Park Road Suite 1W   Chicago, Illinois 60618   773.588.5410  773.588.5440 (Facsimile)


© 2005-2008 Mudd Law Offices
All Rights Reserved

 
  Individual Services
  Business Services
  Our Clients
  OUR CASES
     Current Cases
     Past Cases
  Recent Updates
  Stages of RIAA Initiative
     Subpoena
     Identity Revealed
     John Doe Lawsuits I
     John Doe Lawsuits II
     Amnesty
  Judicial Opinions
  MPAA Legal Initiative
  Litigation
  Our Representation