| Cullen, et al. v. Ybarrolaza,
et al.
Charles Mudd represented Phillip Ybarrolaza in an action filed
against Ybarrolaza and several Doe Defendants for alleged defamatory
statements published by the Doe Defendants at Ybarrolaza's website,
www.teamster.net, regarding the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs sought
information regarding the Doe Defendants from Ybarrolaza and
sought to hold him liable for the statements. On behalf of Ybarrolaza,
Charles Mudd filed a motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds
and immunity under § 230 of the Communications Decency
Act. The Court granted Ybarrolaza's motion to dismiss on jurisdictional
grounds.
Amended Complaint
Pleadings Related to Ybarrolaza's Motion to Dismiss (Documents
with ** filed by our firm)
Defendant
Ybarrolaza's Motion to Dismiss **
Memorandum
in Support of Motion to Dismiss **
Memorandum
in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Reply Memorandum
in Support of Motion to Dismiss **
At the Hearing on January 28, 2005, the Court requested the
Parties provide legislative history on § 230.
Defendant
Ybarrolaza's Memorandum on Legislative History
**
Plaintiffs Supplemental
Legislative History
Order of February
14, 2005
|
